Skip to content →

Category: books

THE HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE STEPS, Michel Faber

The skeletons exhumed so far had all been buried facing east, the direction of Jerusalem, to help Judgement Day run more smoothly.

I bought this back in 2014, and somehow only got around to it at the start of the year. A flawless long short story. Just revel in his clean, direct, shining prose. A very barbed love story with a historical mystery and something like a ghost story carefully threaded around it, but mostly a remarkable miniature of proper literary writing that sweeps all those things around into a brief portrait of a life emerging from fog. Affecting and quietly beautiful. Faber doesn’t show off, doesn’t dance in front of you, just leads you on a walk, remains by your side murmuring his story with a small smile and an occasional warm, mist-dewed hand on your arm.

Through the velux window she could see a trio of seagulls, hopping from roof-tile to roof-tile, chortling at her goose-pimpled, wingless body as she threw aside the bedclothes.

THE HUNDRED AND NINETY-NINE STEPS, Michel Faber (UK) (US+)

Comments closed

RUBICON, Tom Holland

Roman history, rich in event and drama as it is, will always possess something of the quality of the very best science fiction: the narrative of a world that can seem, on occasion, as unsettlingly familiar as it is strange.

For reasons unknown, I bought a bunch of Roman history books a while back. I seem to revisit the period every ten years or so. Tom Holland is a noted author of popular histories, and I believe I have a few of his books. I sometimes hit speed bumps in his work, as he is profoundly Christian and that, on a couple of occasions, has led to statements in his books that I remember having been stalled by. Not here. Although I suspect that the alienness of Roman culture he alludes to here is part of his own perspective in having previously identified his own ethical structures as Greek or Roman before deciding they were in fact Christian.

That said, a successful general painting his face red before a triumph is something that didn’t make it to most modern filmed versions of Roman history, I think. That’s a wonderful fact, and, like the best popular histories, Holland makes the most of those curiosities of lost societies.

Indulgence threatened potency. Gladiators, in the week before a fight, might need to have their foreskins fitted with metal bolts to infibulate them, but citizens were supposed to rely on self-control.

Holland loves an ancient writer. I once had a brief Twitter conversation with him after I got his translation of Herodotus for Xmas one year. And this period he’s writing about gives him Cicero (whom, in my head, I can now only see as David Bamber from the tv series ROME):

Cicero, who admired Cato deeply, could nevertheless bitch that ‘he addresses the Senate as though he were living in Plato’s Republic rather than the shit-hole of Romulus’.

And, perhaps most amusingly to me:

‘It’s now definite that there isn’t an ounce of silver in the whole of Britain,’ Cicero reported a few months later, ‘nor any prospect of loot apart from slaves. And even then,’ he added sniffily, ‘it’s hardly as though you’d expect a slave with a decent knowledge of music or literature to emerge from Britain, is it?’

A hundred and twenty years ago, Europeans were still calling us “The Land Without Music.”

It fairly rips along, this book, and there were periods where I would have liked it to slow down and get into some more detail. But it is a work of popular history, so it needs pace and broad strokes and details that charm or amuse rather then get into the crunchy minutiae:

Caesar’s libido had long been a source of hilarity to his men: ‘Lock up your wives,’ they would sing, ‘our commander is bad news/He may be bald, but he fucks anything that moves.’

Not that Holland doesn’t stop and think. It is a deeply considered book, and its thoughts and conclusions are complex, distilled rather than diluted for the popular-history form.

The unique achievement of Augustus, however, was the brilliance with which he colonised both. His claim to be restoring their lost moral greatness to them stirred in the Romans deep sensibilities and imaginings that at their profoundest could inspire a Virgil, and make their landscape once again a sacred and myth-haunted place.

I can’t imagine a more readable or charming account of this particular period of Roman history.

“A sacred and myth-haunted place.” I love that.

RUBICON, Tom Holland (UK) (US+)

CONNECTED:

Comments closed

DISCOVERING HILL FIGURES

Found this in a bag the other day. When my daughter was growing up, we spent a lot of time driving around the country, and not infrequently stopped for hill figures and other landscape art. (Hetty Pegler’s Tump comes to mind.) This surprisingly well preserved book was a companion for some of that, picked up at some random museum shop no doubt. Couldn’t rely on internet coverage in those days, and data wasn’t fast.

I remember we did the White Horse in Uffington, and stopped at a pub for lunch, where 14 year old her swiped a pint of Arkell’s Summer Ale out of my hand at the bar, sank half of it and declared that she would like one of those. I think we had three each over lunch while my partner, who was driving, viewed us with disgust.

It was my daughter’s birthday this month, and she’s sending photos from a cafe she found that does Movenpick ice cream, which she discovered in Hamburg when she was something like three years old. She’s in her late twenties now.

This cool little book is still available in the UK. And holy shit in the US and elsewhere too.

Comments closed

PROJECT MARS, Wernher von Braun

When I was writing MINISTRY OF SPACE, only the technical appendix to this book, THE MARS PROJECT, was available, and that was invaluable. I picked this up around 2006 to accompany it on a shelf, and promptly lost it until today. It seems to be out of print now. But it’s nice to have it as a bookend to a period of research, and a period of thinking.

Comments closed

THE WHITE BOOK, Han Kang

Han Kang won the Nobel for Literature this year (once again, my guy Krasznahorkai shut out), and I hadn’t read anything by her, so off to Amazon I went. Turns out I chose one of her slimmest books. Slim like a knife. Right in the gut.

The Nobel announcement strongly indicated she was a “trauma” writer in the general autofiction zone. There is a piece early on in this book that… if your chest doesn’t clench and your eyes don’t well, you’re probably dead. It was horrible, heartbreaking and perfectly weighted to destroy the reader.

What do the ghosts of this city do, these muffled early-morning hours? Slip soundlessly out to walk through the fog that has been holding its breath, and waiting? Do they greet each other, through the gaps between those water molecules which bleach their voices white? In some mother tongue of their own, another whose meaning eludes me? Or do they only shake or nod their heads, without the need for words?

Han started out to write a book about things that are white, apparently. This seemed quickly to lead her to death and horror – I have started to wonder if trauma-narrative isn’t just high literary horror – and to what I’ve seen termed “inherited pain.” Han had an older sister who only lived a couple of hours. Sequences of this book are Han imagining the world seen through her dead sister’s eyes.

her mind turned to thoughts of nebulae. To the thousands of stars like grains of salt whose light had streamed down to her, those nights at her parents’ countryside home. Clean, cold light that had bathed her eyes, scouring her mind of all memory.

It goes in hard and cold. In its own words, “cold and irrevocable.” There is nothing warm or soft in it. Everything in it has a frost-rimed edge.

A lot of it is set during a period Han spent living in Poland as a writing retreat, and I get the sense a European Fimbulwinter didn’t do her much good. It is, however, beautifully written, in a translation by Deborah Smith. (And suddenly I realise how much translated work I read these days.)

Only once does it let hopeful light in.

It is not true that everything is coloured by time and suffering. It is not true that they bring everything to ruin.

It is extraordinarily well done, but it is like living inside a grieving person’s nightmares. And that person is grieving for everything.

THE WHITE BOOK, Han Kang (UK) (US+)

Comments closed

THE ORIGIN OF EMPIRE: ROME FROM THE REPUBLIC TO HADRIAN (264 BC – AD 138), David Potter

An entertaining whistlestop tour of a few hundred years of Roman history.

As a coda to the destruction of Macedon, a Roman embassy was sent to Alexandria where the new Seleucid king, Antiochus IV, was taking advantage of the political chaos that had enveloped the kingdom, in order to try to conquer Egypt. They met at Eleusis, not far from Alexandria. As Antiochus approached, the chief Roman ambassador, Gaius Popillius Laenas (himself a former consul and brother of the man who had been so abominable to the Ligurians), is said to have drawn a circle around him with his cane, telling Antiochus that before he stepped out of it he would have to decide whether or not to leave Egypt and accept peace with Rome.

This is the same Eleusis that was home to the Eleusinian Mysteries, which have long fascinated me.

Cassius’ early history include the view that Faunus – often considered a native Italian divinity with prophetic powers – was actually a man whom Evander, the oldest Greek settler in Latium, had met when he arrived there and called a god. Similarly, Hercules was really a robust farmer of Greek extraction, who had likewise lived in Latium but before the arrival of Evander; while the Greeks who allowed Aeneas to pass freely through their ranks because they so respected him created the concept of sacrosanctity – the inviolability of a person.

There’s probably a story there. Sacrosanctity was extended from there to Roman tribunes, the administrators elected by the people for the people.

Rome’s last king, Tarquinius Superbus, invent(ed) crucifixion.

I’ve got a hundred Kindle notes from this book. The benefit of the whistlestop tour is that Potter can strew the book with many many wonderful little facts.

Vespasian arrived in Rome in the autumn of AD 70 and would not leave Italy again. Concentrating his energies on restoring the state finances, ruined by Nero and the subsequent wars, he would also oversee some massive construction projects in Rome and the restructuring of the imperial defences. He would be long remembered for his creative approach to revenue enhancement (including a urinal tax),

The drawback is that very few people are around for more than a couple of pages, and in some sections it becomes a welter of Roman names that appear once or twice and are never seen again, so it can be difficult to keep things straight. That said, it’s a lovely primer for this crucial period, a period I’d largely forgotten about in the decades since I last read Roman history seriously, and I’m definitely better set to finally attack Tom Holland’s RUBICON.

THE ORIGIN OF EMPIRE, David Potter (UK) (US+)

3 Comments

OF WALKING IN ICE, Werner Herzog

OF WALKING IN ICE is an old book by Werner Herzog that I read in 2016. Part journal, part travelogue, part dream record, it’s the story of Werner Herzog’s walk from Munich to Paris to visit a dying friend — on the magical belief that if he walked there, the friend would not die. That’s six hundred miles. It’s kind of heartbreaking, in its way. And it’s the dead of winter, so Herzog is walking face-first into horizontal snowstorms for a lot of it. But it’s also very beautiful, in its descriptions of the frozen German countryside and his little pen-portraits of the people he sees (and mostly avoids) along the way. And the dreams are deliciously strange.

Is the Loneliness good? Yes, it is. There are only dramatic vistas ahead. The festering Rankness, meanwhile, gathers once again at the sea.

It’s short, often melancholic, but, in its way, weirdly life-affirming, even as he treads through the dead world towards a deathbed. A proper winter book. Herzog is a global treasure.

Together, I said, we shall boil fire and stop fish.

OF WALKING IN ICE, Werner Herzog (UK) (US+)

Comments closed

Lenin Shouted In His Sleep: LENIN ON THE TRAIN, Catherine Merridale

That idea crumpled when (Lenin’s) wife reminded him that he would give the game away on any crowded train because he shouted in his sleep. He would have woken an entire carriage, she was certain, with his outbursts, in vernacular but unmistakable Russian, about the perfidies of Kerensky and Miliukov.

He toiled in a high-tension frenzy, his stack of books a fortress wall, his pencils sharpened to cruel points.

It is full of wonderful observations, recovered reportage and bon mots.  Bons mot?

…German officers, who were said to have taken to soaking suspicious cross-border travellers in chemical baths to find out if there might be concealed writing on their skin…

‘Not one party was preparing for the great upheaval,’ remembered Nikolai Sukhanov, then thirty-five years old and working semi-legally as a socialist and writer. ‘Everyone was dreaming, ruminating, full of foreboding, feeling his way.’

Parts of it strongly echo against the walls of the 2010’s. Perhaps not surprising, when a Lenin-admiring political officer sat on the US National Security Council during Trump’s term.

…the new wave were shop-floor radicals who wanted more than talk and promises. Younger, more optimistic and often ready for a fight (Colonel Nikitin, the head of Petrograd counter-intelligence, described them as ‘the dregs of the nation’), the new recruits knew little about ideology or the niceties of Zimmerwald internationalism. They joined the Bolshevik Party because it was known to be the most extreme, the party of the dispossessed, the one whose members talked the toughest line.

LENIN ON THE TRAIN, Catherine Merridale (UK) ((US+)

Comments closed

You want to know how good GNOMON by Nick Harkaway is? I hate him for it.

Imagine a highly-democratised total-surveillance state in the near future. I mean, extraordinarily fine-grained democratic action by and for the people, which also oversees an utterly transparent national surveillance operation. Refusing to participate will get you noticed. If you refuse an interview on the subject, your mind will be read – a process that is not only painless but also has health benefits!

And then someone dies under the process. An inspector is placed on the case to discover how such a rarity could happen. This involves taking the read into her own head, to relive the interviewee’s experience.

There’s something impossible in the read. There’s something impossible in the dead woman’s head.

This book has more than one book in it. It is an astonishing piece of construction, complex and witty and, frankly, evil.

It’s science fiction, but also historical fiction and social fiction and just plain odd fiction. It is a magnificent achievement. He’s never written a bad book, but this is the one that’ll see him mentioned in the same breath as William Gibson and David Mitchell (CLOUD ATLAS). Two names I evoke for very specific reasons.

This book seriously just destroyed me with joy.

GNOMON (UK) (US+)

(note originally written October 2017)

Comments closed

AGAINST THE DAY, Thomas Pynchon

Thomas Pynchon’s AGAINST THE DAY is a book that is almost impossible to finish. In many ways, it defeats the point of finishing it. It’s more than a thousand pages long, and each individual scene is pretty much the size of a novella. It’s a novel that you can dip into like an encyclopedia. It’s set between 1893 and World War I, and it came out in 2006. It’s in no way current. But I’m sitting down and writing this because it’s about everything. It might even be the defining novel of the 21st Century.

It is, as was much post-modernism, about settling the outstanding sociocultural business of the 20th Century. It was the first century bright and loud enough to make the mimetic novel’s tendency to want to tie up all loose ends into a joke. We live now in a century where the CTO of the CIA can proudly announce at a security conference that we can now know everything that happens everywhere in real time, but, as we have since discovered, being able to record everything is not the same as knowing and understanding everything. Every phone call in America is committed to storage for thirty days, but only the tiniest fraction are ever listened to by the state or anyone else. There are hundreds of characters in motion in AGAINST THE DAY. Even the mighty human swarm action of Wikipedia broke against the task of even tracking their action in chapters. In telling a story about the disconnected 20th Century, Pynchon’s omniscient view conjures the blare of the 21st, a world in which the number of people we can invest in and follow the lives of has been calculated by anthropologists. (It’s called the Dunbar Number. A hundred and fifty people.)

AGAINST THE DAY cycles through genres like a long-running television show entering its decadent phase. (And AGAINST THE DAY is certainly a decadent book.) There are sections written in the style of the weird boy’s-own adventures of the period, the “Edisonades” of young scientists romping through fantasy scenarios like demented Scouts. There’s a period detective story, featuring a PI who eats sub-toxic doses of dynamite in order to become immune to explosions. There’s a Western about anarchists, and a subplot about rare crystals that can split a person into two. Doubling is an important theme in the book, and sometimes I think that Pynchon is telling us that there is here: that that time is this time. For all its Zeppelins, Hollow Earth passages and psychics, there’s nothing more strange than the days we live in now.

The world of AGAINST THE DAY is as awash with scientific marvels as ours. Nikola Tesla even makes an appearance. A constant surges of wonders technological and mythical, just as ours: because we live in a world of myths too, the myths of other universes creating cold spots in the sky where they bump against ours, as in the theories of Laura Mersini-Houghton, and the ordinary technological marvels of satellites that speak to the slivers of glass in our pockets and the machines that print new human organs.

What I want to say about it is this: it’s a book about being on the brink. More so than CABARET, not least because CABARET has been defanged by the years and is now nothing more than a dumb receptacle for Weimar chic. CABARET is about being blind to the brink. AGAINST THE DAY casts the brink as an oncoming storm, the biggest one in history, the one that nobody could be prepared for. It’s the story of being in the eye of it. There were a few such eyes in the 20th Century. There will be none in the 21st, the era of what the tech community is pleased to call “disruption.” This is how we’re going to live from now on – surrounded by the swirl of strange and terrible weather, never quite knowing when the great black wall of it will shift and slam into us. AGAINST THE DAY will remain relevant, because it’s the picture of every minute of every day from now on. Amazing things, every single different kind of story we can imagine, and the altitude thrill of constantly being on the edge of bubbling fatal chaos.

AGAINST THE DAY is the double of the modern world. It’s the book we never want to finish.

AGAINST THE DAY, Thomas Pynchon (UK) (US+)

(Written in the mythic year of 2012 for EDICT magazine)

CONNECTED:

2 Comments