Skip to content →

Tag: russian

reaching into fog: 13feb26

Emi Mizukami

Yesterday I wrote my newsletter and then the Beehiiv editor deleted half of it, never to be seen again, which will teach me to write directly into a web page. Everything is so fucking broken these days that even writing into a web-based word processor is like reaching into fog and fooling yourself that there’s something solid in there.

I’m not on Bluesky, I glance at X once in a blue moon, I never bothered with Threads and I can go days without even thinking about IG, but this piece by Sean Bonner made me wonder what the hell is going on out there in the fog:

…a lot of conversations on BlueSky are still about how they aren’t using X. This is a pretty common thing in the beginning of any social site, but I admit I was surprised that this far long that’s still such a common theme there. And it isn’t just X, but posting about not using a whole collection of other apps and services, and also guilting/shaming others for using any of those apps and services. People are even making block lists (more on that next) of people who use other services.

Yesterday evening I made blood orange mimosas.

TODAY:

We are living in a time of great change and great boredom and at the intersection of chaotic change and mind-numbing boredom lies insanity.

I really need to get around to buying a full subscription to 8ball one of these days.

I got given a digital copy of this and am looking forward immensely:

OPERATIONS: really need to crack a broken ten-page section of script today
STATUS: 💀💀💀
READING: THE QUEEN’S AGENT: FRANCIS WALSINGHAM AT THE COURT OF ELIZABETH I (UK) (US+)
LISTENING:


THINKING ABOUT: adding to the notebook system. Also the systems novel.

MISSION CONTROL: I can be contacted via the Cheng Caplan Company or Inkwell Management. Link in masthead to join my free newsletter.

Comments closed

HOW TO STAGE A COUP, Rory Cormac

Much mythologized and heavily romanticized, covert action is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the grey zone within international politics.

This was good fun. Essentially a tour of spookwork past and present (the book was published in 2022).

The grey zone is not some blurred line between war and peace; such a thing has always existed. The real grey zone is epistemic: blurred lines between what we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. The novelty in all of this comes from the fluctuating space between covert action and public knowledge, the decline of state secrecy and the rise of multiple competing narratives churned out across a kaleidoscopic media landscape.

There are, perhaps obviously, things here that I can connect to the Prigozhin book, especially considering he ran the troll farm Internet Research Agency, and that book’s detailing of infighting in the adhocracy:

Russia seeks to seamlessly meld disinformation, subversion, offensive cyber operations and conventional military force. This is not to exaggerate the success of Russia’s approach, though. Putin is no chess grandmaster, deviously manoeuvring his pieces across a global board. Russia’s intelligence agencies compete with each other; covert action is the outcome of bureaucratic infighting. They might take on dangerously risky operations simply to outdo each other; they might encroach on each other’s turf; they might tell Putin what he wants to hear simply to curry favour. As one former Russian intelligence officer put it: ‘You do not bring bad news to the tsar’s table.’

Here, I came across the term liminal warfare, which I find defined elsewhere as “a type of warfare that involves operating near the threshold of detectability. It’s characterized by ambiguous actions that are designed to achieve political objectives without triggering a military response.” Per Cormac:

The Kremlin in particular sponsors operations which are ‘sufficient to keep the wound bleeding but insufficient, thus far, to warrant massive retaliation.

I also find herein this little gem:

One head of intelligence at the end of the Cold War acknowledged the secret services’ droit de mort, or right of death.

It’s a very readable book, rippling through ten aspects of global covert action, going deep into detail and unearthing all kinds of interesting stuff while transmitting lessons learned and marking out the immediate future in clear and often disturbing terms.

The next decades will witness more, not fewer, covert actions. As hidden hands become less hidden, these covert actions will rely on confusion, disruption, ambiguity and cynicism; they will reflect our age of formlessness.

Very educational for me. All kinds of useful stuff. Glad I read it.

HOW TO STAGE A COUP, Rory Cormac (UK) (US+)

Comments closed

DOWNFALL, Anna Arutunyan and Mark Galeotti

A short, dense, sharp book about “Putin’s Chef,” the man who formed and ran the Wagner private military company, the man whose armed mutiny nearly reached the Kremlin itself.

…he was ‘sitting’ in Russian parlance, stuck behind barbed wire in what was known as the Zone, the Soviet penal camp system. Old hands in the criminal subculture of the vorovskoi mir, the ‘thieves’ world’, would claim that their real life was that lived inside the Zone.

Prigozhin travelled the world and made millions upon millions, but he never truly left the Zone. This is the story of a born thug and career criminal who learned how to manipulate power but never learned how to armour his own ego against the fact that he was always going to be the hustler with his hand out.

This is, after all, how Putin’s system works. To a considerable extent, it is a modern, bureaucratic state like so many others, its day-to-day actions defined by rules, laws, regulations and institutions. Atop it, though, is an almost medieval court, in which constantly competing factions and individuals are struggling for the most important currency of them all: Putin’s favour. That, in turn, can be converted into whatever else one could want: wealth, fame, power over one’s enemies.

Not that dealing with that world worked out well for everyone in post-Soviet Russia.

…the only man who knew for sure where all the money was, Central Committee treasurer Nikolai Kruchina, fortuitously fell out of a window.

There is a dark dry humour woven through the book. Which isn’t out of place when you’re tracing the life of a street criminal who became a restauranteur and caterer who became a mercenary army commander.

Wagner, so named for the callsign used by Utkin, a man who, as one Russian newspaper report so coyly put it, was ‘known for his commitment to the aesthetics and ideology of the Third Reich’. (He would even sometimes greet Prigozhin with ‘Heil Petrovich,’ using his boss’s codename.) Naming a mercenary army after the German composer may seem surreal, but it later led to a whole slew of supportive memes, with the force being referred to euphemistically as the ‘orchestra’.

The Russian Defense Ministry described Prigozhin thusly: “no morals, no conscience, and no hobbies … He is a machine in the bad sense of the word.” He made himself into a machine for gathering money and power, but the book makes it clear he was always on the outside of real power. The story would almost be a tragedy if Prigozhin wasn’t such a fucking monster. It seems apt that, towards the end of his story, he came full circle:

The first videos that emerged showed Prigozhin standing in a circle of zeks, Russian penal colony prisoners, in their black and white uniforms. He made no bones about the fact that he was from Wagner, that the war was hard and that he was looking for ‘stormtroopers’, but he made his pitch based on equal parts patriotism, machismo and self-interest: ‘no one falls back, no one retreats, no one surrenders’, if need be on pain of a firing squad, but after six months of honourable service, they would be discharged and free. Or dead: ‘I take you out of here alive, but don’t always bring you back alive.’

Admittedly, at least then their families would receive a 5-million-ruble payout (worth some $57,000 at the time). In many ways, this was quintessential Prigozhin. The ever-resourceful businessman had found a new source of manpower for the war, but he could now be out in the open, and talking to the kind of people he had been able to understand and engage in his twenties and still could today.

The follow up to that teaches me a new phrase: “meat wave.”

To a large extent, they would be used as poorly armed and poorly trained cannon fodder, deployed in so-called ‘meat waves’ to wear down or draw out the Ukrainian forces and shield the more experienced Wagner veterans, and their casualties were inevitably frightful.

It’s perhaps a little light on detail in its final chapter or two, partly because at the time of writing it was (and is) still unknown precisely how Prigozhin was killed. But we all know why. Perhaps the real subject of this book is not Prigozhin, but what examining his life reveals about how modern Russia works. The adhocracy, headed by an ageing tsar who puts off hard decisions for entirely too long.

And Aleksander Dugin pops up!

Putin doesn’t care, because he has created a system in which there are always more waiting for their chance. Take, for example, the philosopher Alexander Dugin, a man whose greatest genius may be in self-promotion. For a short while in 2014, his nationalist views aligned with the interests of the Kremlin and he was elevated to scholarly superstar status, his books on every shelf, interviewed on every television channel. Then official policy changed, and Dugin – who for a while was being described as ‘Putin’s brain’ in the West – was no longer needed. The TV appearances dried up, and he even lost his position at Moscow State University. Yet still he stayed loyal – what else was there for him?

Brilliant book. Zips along, and yet feels very complete. And if, like me, you haven’t read deeply into current Russian politics, it feels like a great primer for the actual state of things inside the Kremlin, and explains much about the current situation.

DOWNFALL (UK) (US+)

One Comment

THE NEW LEVIATHANS, John Gray

Greatly entertaining, but very much a “container” book of the kind Kluge would recognise. I note here Gray’s own note on the Russian writer Rozanov:

He did not pretend to any system of ideas. His four main books – Solitaria, two volumes of Fallen Leaves and The Apocalypse of Our Time – were ‘baskets’ of random thoughts, recorded in the course of cleaning his pipe, examining his coin collection and other daily activities.

Baskets/containers.

It’s a furious railing against many things. Honestly, I stopped wanting to hear the word woke in the early 10s, when I saw someone post a photo of their lunch on Twitter with the caption “this sandwich is so woke.” It appears here entirely too much for me, even when he swaps it with the nonsense term “hyper-liberal.”

Woke hyper-liberalism is Puritan moral frenzy unrestrained by divine mercy or forgiveness of sin.

The opportunity for persecution is one of the attractions of hyper-liberalism. ‘A scapegoat is named, a festival is declared, the laws are suspended: who would not flock to see the entertainment?’

Given that he is not describing anything defined by “liberalism,” he could have done better than a scare-word.

The whole middle section is pen-portraits of intellectuals murdered by either the Soviets or the Germans, both of whom, in Gray’s conception, stand for the corruption of early-modern philosopher Thomas Hobbes’ conception of the “leviathan” state:

As he portrayed it in his masterpiece Leviathan, a state of nature was not in the distant past before the emergence of society but the breakdown of society into anarchy, which could happen at any time. It did not matter whether the sovereign was a king or a president, a parliament or a tyrant. Only a state whose power was unfettered could secure a condition of ‘commodious living’ in which industry, science and the arts could flourish in peace.

Hobbes seems to be Gray’s lodestar, and the reader’s sympathy towards the author’s arguments will in part balance on whether or not you think someone from the 1600s has much to say about the present condition. “Warnings from history” are often good fun to read, but eventually strain their welcome. His structure, such as it is, bends in all kinds of ways as he struggles to connect Hobbes to 20th century criminal states and then 21st century “liberalism,” trying to nail the shadow of Stalin to “woke” and railing at any discussion of racism being underpinned by 21st century American-specific theory. While raising quiet approval of Christian societies – though he does posit an interesting notion here that I don’t think I’ve seen before:

For Christians, plagues were sent by God to test their faith. Believers were enjoined to help one another to live through the trial while preparing for life everlasting. … When disasters struck, the Christians were better able to cope, and this resulted in substantially higher rates of survival. This meant that in the aftermath of each epidemic, Christians made up a larger percentage of the population even without new converts …

Gray strays as he enjoys his portraiture: there’s a sketch of Lovecraft, Freud wanders in, Samuel Beckett shows up a couple of times. (Mostly men, but in part that’s a function of the times he’s looking at.) And he manages to connect them all to Hobbes in one way or another. It’s all very readable. Also, I cannot not quote any piece that mentions cosmism:

A movement whose members described themselves as God-builders appeared in the early twentieth century as a heterodox faction of the Bolsheviks and their sympathizers, including the Commissar of Enlightenment, Anatoly Lunacharsky (1875–1933),35 and the novelist Maxim Gorky (1868–1936). They were inspired by the Orthodox philosopher Nikolai Federov (1829–1903), who believed technology would enable the physical resurrection of every human being that had ever lived, and, in Lunacharsky’s case, by Nietzsche’s idea of the Übermensch, a higher type of human that could be willed into being. The God-building movement was not encouraged by Lenin or Stalin, and by the 1930s no longer existed.

His vocabulary is only occasionally eccentric: he loves the word “antinomian.” His fascination with Hobbes doesn’t force him to cleave to Hobbes’ weirder assertions, such as Hobbes’ plain statement that humans are the property of God and do not own themselves.

Depending on where you sit, this book will careen between “not wrong,” “wrong” and “not even wrong,” but it is full of interesting historical material and the annals of thinking. I had a lot of fun with it and it’s given me twenty new things to research.

THE NEW LEVIATHANS, John Gray  (UK) (US+)

CONNECTED:

Comments closed

Death Artists

I was watching STATE FUNERAL on Mubi:

Moscow, March 1953: in the days following the death of Joseph Stalin, countless citizens flooded the Red Square to mourn their leader’s loss and witness his burial. Though the procession was captured in detail by hundreds of cameramen, their footage has remained largely unseen until now.

And this part caught my eye. The artists of Stalin’s funeral:

Even a sculptor.

Comments closed

the aborted preparation of a series of attacks on the moon

the dystopian oeuvre of Antoine Volodine – the primary pseudonym of a multifariously named French-Russian writer – forecasts the cumulative effect of successive waves of political and ecological catastrophe in futures where “the worst of barbarous human or subhuman history had been reached and even surpassed”, as Volodine writes in Mevlido’s Dreams. First published in French in 2007, and nimbly translated by Gina M. Stamm, this novel begins with a scene that at first seems to be from the Soviet era: after a speech on “proletarian morality”, Mevlido, a middle-aged policeman, bashes his superior on the head with a brick during the latter’s “self-criticism”. But the crimes to which his superior confesses are trivial or absurd – “theft of toilet paper”; “the aborted preparation of a series of attacks on the moon”

https://app.the-tls.co.uk/tls_article/only-kill-advisedly/pugpig_index.html

Comments closed